top of page

Building Integrity

Qualitative

As a zero net energy and water building with a total floor area of 6,100 square foot, the Energy Lab received a LEED for Schools Platinum rating in October, and in late April achieved full Living Building Challenge certification—only the third such project to do so. The “Challenge,” a program developed by the Cascadia Green Building Council and widely regarded as the most demanding green building certification system, requires that energy needs be satisfied on-site from renewable sources and that all of its water come from precipitation or from a closed-loop system. The program also prohibits the use of the potentially toxic substances on its “red list,” many of which are commonplace in construction materials. In addition, it places limits on the distance from which products can be shipped in order to reach a building site. In all, 20 “imperatives,” or prerequisites, must be met for a project to be designated as “living.”

 

To make the most of the site's natural assets and satisfy the project's goals, the team developed a scheme made up of three long and narrow volumes that step down with the landscape and open to views to the south. These volumes echo the materials and structural systems of buildings elsewhere on campus: They have walls of boards and battens and poured-in-place concrete and roofs supported by wood decking spanning glue-laminated beams. The uppermost barlike element has a double-pitched roof canted so that it nearly touches the ground and deflects the strong wind from the north. The two lower volumes are sheltered under gently sloping shed roofs with deep overhangs that shield the interiors from heat gain.

 

In addition to providing shelter from the elements, the roofs also provide surfaces for energy production and rainwater collection. The two shed roofs incorporate 27 kW of generating capacity, with three types of photovoltaics (PV), including a 4 kW array of bifacial panels (a type of PV in which the back face generates electricity from ambient light reflected off surrounding surfaces). The precipitation that falls on the roofs feeds a 10,000-gallon storage tank that provides water for hand washing, toilet flushing, janitorial needs, and irrigation.

 

The energy-conservation and energy -generation strategies have proved so effective that in the first year of operation, the building consumed only a little more than half of the power predicted by the design team's model, and exported 25,285 kWh of electricity produced by the PVs to the campus grid (about 60 percent of the power generated). Exhaust fans, intended to augment the natural ventilation scheme, have so far not been needed. And a backup split air-conditioning system, included in the building primarily to keep sensitive lab equipment cool in extreme conditions, has also never been used.

 

The vigilance also plays a significant role in the lab's efficiency. The BMS, depends on about 600 sensors distributed throughout the building that monitor everything from CO2 levels, temperature, and humidity to power generation and consumption. It automates the operations of many of the building's systems and gives real-time information about such factors as energy generation and use. It even can identify specific equipment that has been left on mistakenly, such as a printer or the UV lamps that students use for experiments.

 

The sustainability-centric design has proved wildly successful. In 2010 the Lab had - 60% energy usage, meaning the HPA saved $10,200 by feeding this energy into the rest of the campus. 100% water neutral, the Lab collects all of its water from precipitation and treats all wastewater onsite. A specific mixed mechanical and natural ventilation system was developed to reduce operating costs and cooling loads. The 27kW photovoltaic array on the roof generated 48, 295kWh of electricity in 2010 and is connected to the national grid via the rest of the campus to distribute or store excess electricity production. The holistic design is controlled by an innovative building automation system. The system continuously logs and monitors data in occupied zones, reacting by optimizing the lab’s performance through its energy systems. The living laboratory is powered by renewable energy, with solar panels on the roof and a couple small-scale wind turbines on the hill behind the school. The Energy Lab actually only uses 8% of the power it generates, while the rest is fed into the grid and goes to power the rest of the buildings at the academy, making it a zero plus facility.

 

The most subjective of the Living Building Challenge performance areas is ‘Beauty’. The category refers not only to aesthetics but also to harmony with location, environment, and culture. Flansburgh Architects and the school chose three native phrases to organize and express their ideas for designing beauty in a lasting way. Ike (sense of place), Kuleana (responsibility or territory), and Ohana (family or community) are evident in the building's use of materials, relationship to the site, and the mission of the school. The school's location in one of the most beautiful places on earth also naturally adds to the project's beauty.

The Hawaii Preparatory Academy Energy Lab uses elements of traditional tropical structures (e.g. open ventilation, jalousies or louvers, courtyard plan) with modern technologies to create a building that is respectful of history, the present culture, and future generations. The aesthetics are not brutal or plain, but reflective of the culture while still looking very modern.

Natural Wind Use of Energy Lab

Integration with the Site

 

Located at the windward edge of campus to take full advantage of the abundant trade winds that accelerate down from the hillside above. The site faces due south to picturesque 14,000 foot Mauna Kea volcano. Due southern exposure optimizes solar thermal and photovoltaic panel performance and enables many interior building views directed toward the volcano and valley below. Given the favorable Hawaiian climate and the building’s dramatic hillside setting direct connections to the outdoors are enhanced via operable glass doors. An entry court is located to the east, a large teaching porch opens directly south, and a wind sheltered court to the west sponsors and outdoor, covered classroom. The topography of the hillside is reflected in the stepped, terraced arrangement of the building’s internal spaces, where storage tanks, solar panels and other systems have been strategically located to take advantage of this change in elevation.

N

Site Location of the Energy Lab

Integration with the Community

 

The Elab online, the facility’s website, is a virtual nexus of information. The site tracks local weather data from multiple remote stations, monitors building systems and energy use, studies water consumption and rain collection, and offers all of this valuable microclimate and building data to neighboring residents of Kamuela and to the virtual community beyond. The Energy Lab’s conference room has been designed to take advantage of Hawaii’s bridge between the West Coast and Asian Mainland time zones. Where formerly Hawaii may have suffered from geographical isolation, Hawaii Prep students now benefit by engaging both sides of the pacific during their regular school day via video conferencing.

Building Systems Monitoring

 

Developed to function much like the human brain, the Energy Lab is capable of regulating its breathing, cooling/heating, watering and energy generation, via input from over 250 sensors. The Energy Lab self-regulates its interior climate, maintaining temperature, relative humidity, and carbon dioxide levels in all spaces at all times. Truly a marvel, this system optimizes building performance and is believed the reason for better than anticipated yields in performance thus far.

Quantitative

Key Parameters

 

Location: Kamuela, Hawaii (Kohala Mountain Foothills)

Gross area: 12,000 ft2 (1,115 m2): 6,000 ft2 (557 m2), enclosed; 6,000 ft2 (557 m2), exterior

Cost: $4.5 million

Completed: January 2010

Annual purchased energy use (based on metered usage): 0.0; 100% reduction from base case

Annual carbon footprint: -5.8 lbs. CO2/ft2 (-28.6 kg CO2/m2)

Program: Subdivisible project rooms, adaptable workstations, laboratory, monitoring room, director’s office, and conference room

Material Sources

 

Structural system: Calvert Company Inc.  Douglas Fir glue-laminated beams

Windows: Breezeway Altair Louvered

Glazing: PPG Solarban 60 Insulated

Doors: Southwest Aluminum Storefront & Door System

Paints and stains: Sherwin-Williams; Safecoat Durastain (cedar)

Floor and wall tile: Sonoma Tilemakers

Carpet: Bentley Prince Sreet

Lighting: Elliptipar

Blinds: MechoShade

Some of the project’s technologies that fulfill Living Building Challenge requirements include the following

 

  • A greyfield site that had been used to dump and bury bio waste and debris from a previous construction project

  • A potable rainwater collection system and leach field treatment and infiltration wastewater system

  • Photovoltaic arrays and windmills

  • Natural heating, cooling, and ventilation system consisting of operable windows, operable and mechanized louvers, screens, and roller shades

  • Low VOC (volatile organic compound) and zero VOC materials, furnishings, and finishes

  • An integrated design process involving the owner, the owner’s project manager, an energy/sustainability consultant, structural engineer, and MEP engineer

Climate & Energy Data

 

Several factors account for the building's even-better-than-expected performance. The most important is a difference between the microclimates at the building site and at Hilo Airport—the location where the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) collected the historical weather data used in the simulations. Although the airport is the closest site with such information, it is situated at 38 feet above sea level and on the coast, while the Hawaii Prep campus, about 60 miles away, is at a much higher elevation and further inland. Now that the energy lab has been open and collecting data from its own rooftop weather station for more than a year, it is clear that the actual conditions at the site are much more favorable for natural ventilation than the DOE data indicates.

High Building Performance

It doesn't scream ‘sustainable building. It is just real architecture, appropriate to its climate and its context.

 

-- David Croteau (Flansburgh president)

SENV 7006 Group 3

PEI Pei

1155051003

CAI Lifu

1155052887

LIU Bowen

1155053297

bottom of page